|
|
|
|
|
Country
Profile
The Kingdom of Swaziland
under the leadership of King Mswati III, Africa 's last absolute
monarchy, has continued to face numerous socio-political
and economic challenges. Despite the coming into effect of
the country's new constitution on 8 February 2006 , tensions
regarding the constitutional developments still exist. What
remains a great challenge is the issue of political parties.
|
Whilst
freedom of assembly and association is guaranteed in the 151-page
constitution, political parties are not mentioned. As a result
it is not clear whether or not Swaziland has moved from a non-party
state to multi-party democracy. In the light of the uncertainty,
some political parties with the belief that they are free to operate,
have positioned themselves for power while others holding a different
view have intensified the pressure for the recognition of political
party activity in line with modern democracy. The King in the meantime
has openly declared that the country is not yet ready for political
parties.
Although the constitution, with a Bill of Rights, has been viewed both
locally and internationally as an important development for Swaziland ,
it ushers in very little change. In fact, it has tried to balance the concerns
of the royal establishment keen to retain power and the local and international
demands for political reform in the landlocked country. But largely, the
constitution has entrenched the past. The King has retained his sweeping
powers. He remains the head of the executive arm of government. No bill
passed by parliament becomes law without his assent. The King still appoints
the Prime Minister and Cabinet. In addition, he also appoints chiefs and
judges after consulting his cluster of traditional advisors, especially
the SNC (Swazi National Council) who are a body of powerful yet handpicked
individuals.
In terms of the new dispensation, the constitution is the ultimate law
of the land, but the King remains above the law and cannot be the subject
of parliamentary legislation. He may dissolve parliament at any time. The
King, the Queen Mother, and the resurrected traditional post of Authorised
Person, who assumes executive duties if a king should die, cannot be taxed
or sued.
The King further retains his powers in the legislature. He appoints 20
of the 30-member upper House of Senate, eight of whom must be women. The
other 10 Senate members, five of whom must be women, are then appointed
by the lower House of Assembly. The King also has appointees in the House
of Assembly. He appoints 10 in addition to 55 elected MPs.
The only important departure from the past is the King's inability to rule
by decree. The constitution makes no reference to the King ruling by decree.
All legislative powers remain with parliament. In the judiciary, the Supreme
Court becomes the Kingdom's highest judicial body.
Another important milestone is the reversal of the 29 year-old state of
emergency. The King has pronounced, though vaguely, that the infamous King's
Proclamation of 1973 is no longer in existence following the coming into
effect of the constitution. The Proclamation immensely effected freedom
of expression and banned political parties. It further allowed the King
to rule by decree.
Despite the new constitutional dispensation, civil society has still not
been exposed to good civic education on matters of good governance and
democratic dispensation. Security forces continue to keep all dissenting
voices under control in the name of public order and national security.
Issues & Challenges
Media Challenges the Case for Reform
Swaziland is clearly in a state of socio-economic, legal
and political flux as it attempts to grapple with many challenges, particularly
that relating to the transition from largely autocratic regime to a more
open and democratic dispensation. The recognition and legal protection
of fundamental rights and freedoms is seen as a basic tenant of both democracy
and good governance. Read
more
|
 |
 |
 |
| |
|