|
|
|

|
|
Legal
Support
Programme Goal
Improve media legal environment through
strategic interventions and support to victims of media violations
and
criminalisation of media work and to influence public opinion
through exposure of media court cases. |
Situation
and Challenges
Southern African journalists and media institutions
still frequently face legal challenges; especially criminal defamation
and libel that violate
internationally accepted standards on the rights and freedom of the
media.
The majority of cases concern criminal defamation, which is quite prevalent
in the region, with most cases being in Angola, Lesotho, Malawi, Swaziland,
Zambia and Zimbabwe. A common feature of these cases in the criminalisation
of ‘insult' to the president or head of state or national symbol
which are ‘protected' by national law.
A good example of criminalisation of media is that currently obtaining
in Zimbabwe since independence, but recently reinforced by the promulgation
of AIPPA and POSA in 2002. It is a criminal offence to publish “false” information
prejudicial to the state, or false information adversely affecting the
economic interests of Zimbabwe or which undermines public confidence
in a law enforcement agency, the prison services or the defense forces
of
the country. Over 80 journalists have been arrested and 3 newspapers
have been closed down using AIPPA and POSA.
MISA-Zimbabwe formed the Media Defense Fund (MDF) in 2002. The MDF, which
is run by a separate board chosen by MISA-Zimbabwe, is meant to assists
journalist in distress especially as a result of arrests and any litigation
that has a bearing on media and freedom of expression rights. The MDF has
so far assisted 60 journalists and media workers. Through the MDF, IJAZ
was able to mount a Constitutional challenge on AIPPA. The MDF is also
playing a key role in the case of the closed The Daily News and The Daily
News on Sunday and The Tribune, the 3 newspapers closed down using AIPPA.
In Botswana, Lesotho and Zambia, the legal threat to media is largely due
to disproportionately high awards given to civil defamation litigants against
publishers.
In Swaziland, the Proscribed Publications Act of 1968 was used to shutdown
the Guardian Newspaper and the Nation magazine in 2001, though the latter
was able to come back after a few months, while the former has failed to
come back despite winning their High Court case in 2002. The country does
not have a protection of journalistic sources provision in its laws.
In 1995, MISA co-organized an East and Southern Africa conference on media
law with Article 19. This later led to establishment of a Media Lawyers
Network which was later convened in 1999 and 2001.
The network has since been inactive, though MISA intends to continue to
support lawyers to enable them to defend media practitioners. To this end,
MISA will seek to resuscitate the Media Lawyers Network in an effort at
alliance building in defense of broader issues of freedom of expression
and media freedom. Read
more
|
 |
 |
 |
| |
|